<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emergency Contraception: Exposing Princeton’s Institutional Involvement in Reproductive Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theprincetontory.com/main/emergency-contraception-exposing-princeton%e2%80%99s-institutional-involvement-in-reproductive-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theprincetontory.com/main/emergency-contraception-exposing-princeton%e2%80%99s-institutional-involvement-in-reproductive-politics/</link>
	<description>A journal of conservative and moderate thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:47:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Princeton and Plan B &#171; Equal Writes</title>
		<link>http://theprincetontory.com/main/emergency-contraception-exposing-princeton%e2%80%99s-institutional-involvement-in-reproductive-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Princeton and Plan B &#171; Equal Writes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprincetontory.com/main/?p=180#comment-99</guid>
		<description>[...] lot of discussion about Princeton and Plan B (a form of emergency contraception) recently, from the Tory&#8217;s lambasting of the Office of Population Research&#8217;s site on EC to an article in the Prince titled, simply, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lot of discussion about Princeton and Plan B (a form of emergency contraception) recently, from the Tory&#8217;s lambasting of the Office of Population Research&#8217;s site on EC to an article in the Prince titled, simply, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tory&#8217;s December issue packed full of homophobic, anti-feminist articles &#171; Equal Writes</title>
		<link>http://theprincetontory.com/main/emergency-contraception-exposing-princeton%e2%80%99s-institutional-involvement-in-reproductive-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Tory&#8217;s December issue packed full of homophobic, anti-feminist articles &#171; Equal Writes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprincetontory.com/main/?p=180#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] In the feature, Toni Alimi and Robert Marsland &#8220;expose&#8221; Princeton&#8217;s &#8220;institutional involvement in reproductive politics.&#8221;  The subject of this rather dramatic article is the website run by the Office for Population Research about emergency contraception.  We&#8217;ve written about the site before here on EW; the director, Woodrow Wilson School professor James Trussell, is a pioneer for pro-choice activism and one of the preeminent American experts on emergency contraception.  The site is simply a great source of information about emergency contraception.  Alimi and Marsland, however, attack it for &#8220;going beyond merely providing &#8216;neutral&#8217; information&#8221; and encouraging increased use of emergency contraception (the horror!).  They also accuse the site of an &#8220;overtly pro-choice&#8221; agenda, and &#8220;withholding or obfuscating crucial information about the continuing controversy over the safety of the drugs and their abortifacient potential.&#8221;  To which I say: for the last time, emergency contraception does not cause abortion, and providing information does not mean promoting a particular agenda.  The site is an accurate source of information, which is important, because emergency contraception is a crucial resource and should be available and affordable to all women.  Far from pushing an agenda, the site (and the OPR) provide a public service. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the feature, Toni Alimi and Robert Marsland &#8220;expose&#8221; Princeton&#8217;s &#8220;institutional involvement in reproductive politics.&#8221;  The subject of this rather dramatic article is the website run by the Office for Population Research about emergency contraception.  We&#8217;ve written about the site before here on EW; the director, Woodrow Wilson School professor James Trussell, is a pioneer for pro-choice activism and one of the preeminent American experts on emergency contraception.  The site is simply a great source of information about emergency contraception.  Alimi and Marsland, however, attack it for &#8220;going beyond merely providing &#8216;neutral&#8217; information&#8221; and encouraging increased use of emergency contraception (the horror!).  They also accuse the site of an &#8220;overtly pro-choice&#8221; agenda, and &#8220;withholding or obfuscating crucial information about the continuing controversy over the safety of the drugs and their abortifacient potential.&#8221;  To which I say: for the last time, emergency contraception does not cause abortion, and providing information does not mean promoting a particular agenda.  The site is an accurate source of information, which is important, because emergency contraception is a crucial resource and should be available and affordable to all women.  Far from pushing an agenda, the site (and the OPR) provide a public service. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
